To demonstrate how "political correct" it has become in Sweden to counteract the debate of "the child's good", this page will illustrate what the discussion can be like on internet.

A female internet group, working against automatic shared custody of children, repeatedly contacted, looked for conflict and "attacked" unknown people working for the same cause. They did so under false premises that they were helping "abused women" and working to prevent violence against women. It was later proved that their intent was something entirely different. For instance they work actively to prevent children from seeing their fathers.

Many are of the opinion that it is mostly men who in different ways harm other people on internet, but women also do this to men in different ways, to harm, threat, abuse or slander them. One of the worst cases of abuse and misuse in swedish history is probably performed by the roughly fifty year old Annica Tiger, in her diary on internet. She even bought the nodaddy.se site and constructed a so-called "Hate-website" on wich a father was pointed out like as a psyco. On this picture the fathers name is hidden to protect the mans family.

The people to be most exposed were parents trying with different means to gain normal custody with their children. This was not approved by Annica and some of her diary friends.

The leaders of the Swedish internet group Fågel Fenix, with Katinka Löfquist (who claims to be helping victims of battery) seems to be the worst in the world in using these actions. They must be the worst because they are the most studied and because they hide behind noble purposes.
You could say that the members of this group went even further as they even phoned their, as they say, "enemy's and antagonist's" employer, to make them read the woman's internet diaries, containing lies about the employees. Many companies were contacted.

The fathers were contacted several times, sometimes by mail when the women had published text on the internet about some of the men.
It was explained to Katinka Löfqvist that the parents wished to be left in peace and that the women's acting was harming both children and parents.
A few days later it came out that the group of women already had carried on several profound investigations about the parents and some private people, something commented by Löfqvist on her personal homepage.

The group of women weren't ashamed over their actions. Instead, they openly declared their real intent. They even expressed their joy over what they had done and planned to do, instead of trying to hold back their feelings. On their private homepages one could instead see that they prefer rough violence before communication.

Many of them describe how they battered men with both physical and psychological violence, a battering which has sometimes taken place when they were under the influence of drugs.
Several described thoroughly in what way they would like to commit brutal murder of men.
One of the leaders once tried to murder her own child and then cut herself in the wrists, laying in bed waiting for her man to come home. She wanted the father to see her laying in her own blood. The same woman entered a discussion group for paternal matters where she humiliated and raised women and men against each other.
When she was replied to, the women who had infiltrated the daddy groups, made reports to different internet companies.
On at least one occasion the same woman published false evidence on internet to mislead the readers to believe the named persons to be criminals.

Another woman even wanted to kill a man even though, as she wrote herself, she has no reason to do so !!!
Yet another woman confessesed that the police no longer believe in all the reports she has made against her husband, because they earlier had found out she was not telling the truth.
The woman then tried to have her husband declared insane, without ground. However the head physician established that it was the father who was sane. Instead the wife teached on the internet how sane men could be sent to psychiatric institutional care without any cause.
Several of the women openly confessed on the internet having been unfaithful to their husbands. Afterwards they even deride their men, also on the internet.
Many of them have a criminal background. On their homepage men offered their services to "beat up" other men that the women dislike.

Annica Tiger, well known on internet, described their true view of male victims of battery; "They are weak men without manhood".
The fixation on sex and sexuality connected to the discussion of feminism and children could be noted on her homepage. There you could read about men and daddies, for whom she expressed her disgust, pointed out in relation to the size of their organs.

A magazine columnist suggested in her guest book that they should call themselves "The knights of Tiger", and that they are at least 50 people signing up in the war against the children and their parents. The women also used military conceptions, as for example "enemies and agitators", "commando soldiers" and "squadron of cavalry". It is later proved that these "Knights" mainly consisted of female diary writers on internet.

Many of the group members used their private homepages to "profit on and earn money", as companies are lured to contribute with sponsored money. It turns out the writers themselves composed invented stories of female battery, stories which they published on the internet.
Other members used their diaries to discredit or threaten private people and companies.
They were supported with great zest by Annica Tiger, who on her homepage teached how harassments on the internet are to be conducted against mainly private people. Through special "javascripts" on different homepages, an unskilled reader wouldn't be able to tell how some of the harassments and threats were made, against fathers and private people. Some members wrote their diaries under several different names. Many of the women, who also are members of different hound owner clubs, used the homepages to argue with other members of the same group. Most of the reports and complaints to us concern this, says the Data Inspection Board in an article in a magazine, Monday the 4 of June 2001.

Who are these people, who present themselves to be working for battered women, but who actually are very well educated in computer technology? They are mainly a few women and a few men working at patrolling companies, working in IT, commercials and PR. Companies who have customers from the local authority, private companies, medicine and security companies, banking and insurance companies. Many of these women are single mothers who are studying at a work training program for adults.

Mothers and fathers working for "parents to be equals for children", were later exposed.
For example

The group of women working against automatically shared custody tried to map out and collect information about fathers while custody processes were going on at court's. They did that by infiltrating different rooms of discussions on the internet, using false names. The obtained information was used for harassments in form of different unfounded reports of the parents to police and other authorities.
The men's ex girlfriends and ex-wives were contacted by the group of women, providing them with information to be used against the men in dispute of parent ship.
However, even the ex-wives would feel that they had had enough. One ex-wife for example phoned Annica Tiger, asking her to "mind her own buissnes" after Annica had cooperate with the police against one man.
So even the ex-wives felt harassed by this group of women.

A father felt very harassed by several of these women in the group against female battery. He felt he was so severely threatened and molested that he finally went to the police.
Another person felt so bad, due to these women's actions, that he/she had to see a doctor for help. Yet another person had to end his studies because the same women harassed him so badly. The man, who prior had had police protection against his ex-wife, suffered severe psychological damage by these ongoing harassments.

Several companies had to take special precautions to protect themselves and their customers against some of the most dangerous women.

Annica Tiger is fully aware that some private people feel threatened by her. Although she on several occasions has been informed of this fact, she continued to act in this threatening way.
One can see that she is fully aware of her threatening effect when she cut out text informing her that she has been threatening (real text) people.
To answer these accusations she replayed that her homepage were not affected by the "law of personal" and that she therefore could ignore it and behave in whatever way she found appropriate. On the other hand she instead denied the accusations when it is presented to her by the Data Inspection Board of Sweden.

Even private companies were attacked on the internet by the anger of Bird Fenix (Fågel fenix). Some of the exposed companies are SPIES, the university of Gothenburg, SPRAY and Telia. The internal network of Stockholm City were mapped out in detail by the women's.

Annica Tiger even demanded that responsible persons at Stockholm City should read her internet diary and also what she had written and made up the lies she had written about their employees. What she really wanted to obtain by these phone calls was to show the employers what their employees wrote on their spare time. This is revealed by herself in a debate in a magazine, Aftonbladet, in her own statement number 151. In these phone calls she threatened Stockholm government with police reports if they don't obey her personal demands. One of these phone calls and emails were made on February the 29 and the 1 of Mars 2000.

Tiger chose, although fully aware and reminded that this was taken as a threat, to publish delicate information. Shortly after she had made these phone calls the very Stockholm government was exposed to data virus. This virus was constructed to send code names to a special email address.
Stockholm government has now established special routines, all according to Annica's personal wishes and demands, given by her to the responsible persons ar the local authorities. (In this connection Löfqvist plays a certain part, to which we will return later on, see text about negotiations between representatives for Stockholm authorities and the women's group).

During May and June year 2000 the two groups were involved in a big quarrel in the magazine, Aftonbladet. The headline of this debate was "Are both parents to be recognized as guardians". In this debate the harassments succeeded each other, and it finally degenerated so badly that the newspaper had to close the debate down. (Due to this only a few of these messages are shown here, apart from nr 17 that was later taken away as it was considered to be harassments beyond common etiquette on internet).

Shortly after another debate got published in the same magazine, "Should the law's be changed? How can we stop men from battering women?" Using "Nagging" Annica Tiger with friends succeeded to get the magazine to close down the debate. After a short while, Annica Tiger published the debate on her own internet website, but hidden so that only people she had given special admittance could be able to read.

After these debates the leaders of Fenix starts a hunt on these men and women who had "dared" to write about "custody matters". The debaters were to be tracked down. The reports succeeded each other and so did advanced retails of home computers. These were made with the help from different internet companies. Together with the responsible debate columnist at the magazine, Annica Tiger conspired about how she would be able to make police reports on the debaters. By using unfounded reports she managed to get her hands on the debaters IP-numbers, which helped her to track them down. These IP-numbers were then spread to different people.

A man was reported to the police by Annica Tiger as he had written a letter to the editor on custody matters in Sundsvalls newspapper. She claimed that the writer had mentioned her by name, among others. At the control it was found that no names were used at all.
Even the magazine Aftonbladet was reported by Annica to the Chancellor of justice, as they had failed to fulfil her demands.

In a well known case in Sweden, where the poor girl Kimberly was kidnapped from her father in South Africa, the group of women were active again. They became prominent figures in the struggle for Kimberly to stay in Sweden with her mother.
At Sergels Torg in Stockholm they gathered using placards. They joined the rest of the demonstrators, who had help from famous artists to bring out their message. The father was slandered and pointed out as an extremely unsuitable father, dangerous for his own daughter. However it turned out that both parents proved to have parental competence and that they together could agree on what would be best for their child. This agreement was made first after the father had agreed to pay for all the expensive air flights for both the mother and the child.
The father got single guardianship and Kimberly is to live with her father. The courts have decided that that is the best place for her to be. The poor girl probably wouldn't feel too god if she was to return to Sweden, only to read what these women has written about her father, who she loves so dearly. And how would her brothers react if they read what was written about their beloved father'

Many parents have had to have "talks of crises" in different ways, sometimes together with their children, because of the anxiety they feel about the threats from the aggressive and dangerous group of women. Because of them, several parents live in anxiety and anguish, not only for what might happen at present, but also for what these internet writing women might do to their children in the future. The children can of course sense this anxiety and anguish that their parents are going through, and it is not unlikely that these children themselves will need therapy due to this in the future. Even management at several companies have been informed that they might become "an object for the temper of the female group". The police now have the names of several of the members, in case something would happen to the parents or the exposed companies.

An example that will confirm the statements above is easily found, if you look for the words sabotage of the right of parental access (In Swedish, Umgängessabotage) on the search engine Evreka. You only found 19 hits. Enough information for scientific studies and estimations couldn't be found at all. This was the fact in Sweden in the year 2000. Still, year 2002, Annica Tiger were active, now she had put the words "Sabotage of the right of parental access" in her own metatags.
That way it is mainly her views that were put forward on internet.

In Internet language this proceeding is called "spamming" or "abuse", which is clearly declared in the stipulations made by the search engines and the internet suppliers.

Unfortunately science and inquiries published in media about men, fathers and matters of custody in Sweden, often concentrates on defaming the male sex. This is performed by women with an especially negative attitude towards, or negative experience by, men.
Many of these women are also lacking scientific competence in these fields of science and inquiries. Some of these women falsely claim to have a relevant education only to have their own results and statements established. Annica Tiger, who published results of her own investigations in her internet diary, stated that 48 % of the persons in her investigation group show signs of psychological defects or other signs that make them unsuitable to be sound parents.

The group she has chosen to be her investigation group however turns out to be the group of parents for which she earlier has expressed her deepest disgust. At several occasions she published her own medical diagnoses on men in this investigation group on the internet. She claimed to have adequate competence to do so as she is a mental nurse, she says. She even wrote private letters to authorities saying that certain people are mentally ill. The fact is that she only has a two year education for psychiatric assistant at hospital, which doesn't qualify her to the competence she claims to have.
Another example of this claim of adequate education is when Katinka Löfqvist stated to be a nurse, although she turns out to be unable to read and understand a normal case record. This is proved as she published a case record on internet of an injured and assaulted man, making incorrect comments.

Is this the way how to carry the debate of shared custody in our country? Are basis for this discussion only permitted to be published by criminal, incompetent, lying and aggressive groups of women? Groups who threaten to murder children and fathers rather than letting them see each other, and who uses their spare time to perform hackings, reports and harassments of people and companies on false grounds.

By the examples mentioned above it must finally be found proved that the public debate of "the child's good" is dominated by female extremist groups acting in their own interests. They claim to act to prevent "Female assault", and use this as an excuse for making "unfounded reports based on lies and false statements" only to win own victories in intercourse and custody processes. It has now even reached a point where women even uses the concept "Female assault" to profit on.

It must also be found proved that the mere system of intercourse and custody matters is constructed in a way that promotes conflicts. This is used by many women today to do them selfves at victms

Many members of Bird Fenix has proven this in very obvious ways.
They try to stop people who have an opposite view in these debates, by using lies, destruction, severe threats, slander, molesting and harassments. They even make false and forged police reports.

This homepage is due to reconstruction and might be totally altered in the future.
No one of the people mentioned above should be accused for everything what the parents were suffered of.

If You want to, You can read each page separately.
You can find the pages directly by clicking the following links

(For the time being the following texts are presented in Swedish only).


Read from Start